跳到主要内容
知仓学习社ZHICANG

linkedin-analytics

Use when someone wants to understand their own LinkedIn numbers — which posts worked, why reach dropped, whether a pattern is real, or how to test a…

不碰外部(只输出文字)无严重或高危命中alirezarezvani/claude-skills

它会碰到什么

扫了多少7 个文本文件,55 KB
它会碰到什么不碰外部(只输出文字)
命中总数0 处
命中统计严重 0 · 高 0 · 中 0 · 低 0

这一栏是扫描器报的事实,不是结论。命中多不等于有毒(安全工具、规则库、示例脚本本来就会包含危险写法),命中少也不等于干净。它和你手上的凭据、文件、网络有什么关系,需要你自己看。

技能内容

LinkedIn Analytics — describe honestly, then refuse to over-conclude

The characteristic sentence of LinkedIn analytics is "carousels do 3x better for me", built

on four posts. With engagement as heavy-tailed as it is, four posts will show a 3x difference

between almost any two groups you care to define. These three scripts stop that sentence

becoming a strategy.

Your own data only. Nothing is fetched; scraping post or profile data is prohibited by

User Agreement §8.2 and none of this analysis needs it.

Workflow

1. Get the export. LinkedIn Analytics → Post impressions → Export, or Settings → Data

privacy → Get a copy of your data. CSV and JSON both work.

2. Describe it. Exit 0 analysed / 2 below the 10-post floor, descriptive only / 3

unusable. Reports median and MAD rather than mean and standard deviation — one breakout post

makes a mean describe a distribution none of your posts belong to — plus Tukey percentile

bands and a 1.5×IQR breakout threshold, so "this did well" has a number behind it.

python3 scripts/post_performance_analyzer.py --input posts.csv --csv --output human

3. Test the pattern they think they see.

python3 scripts/pattern_miner.py --input posts.json --output human

Exit 0 something survived / 2 nothing survived / 3 under 10 posts. Four gates: 5 posts in and

5 out; a 15% relative difference in medians; beating 90% of 2,000 seeded label shuffles; and

a multiple-comparisons accounting of how many candidates would pass on noise alone.

"Nothing survived" is the most common honest answer and it is a real finding. Report it

as one. Do not soften it into a hedge that reads like a conclusion.

4. Turn a survivor into a test.

python3 scripts/experiment_planner.py --hypothesis "..." --variable "..." \
  --cv 0.45 --effect 0.30 --posts-per-week 2 --max-weeks 12 --output human

CV comes from step 2: 1.4826 * MAD / median. Exit 0 feasible / 2 too long, with the minimum

detectable effect in their window / 3 refused. It will frequently say the test needs more

posts than a quarter allows — that is the honest answer, and more useful than a confident

conclusion from retrospective data.

Rules

  • Under 10 posts, describe; do not conclude. Say so plainly.
  • A pattern in past posts is a hypothesis. Retrospective data is confounded — you made

carousels when you had structured material, on topics you knew best, in weeks you had time.

No statistics on the same data removes that.

  • Never benchmark against someone else's numbers. Different denominator, different

audience, usually a vendor's sample.

  • Follower count is not a success metric. Track inbound conversations, specific

references, invitations — the Tier 1 metrics you count by hand.

  • Report the confidence level. LinkedIn-official 🟢, third-party study 🟡, folklore 🔴.
  • One good post is not evidence. It is the most common cause of a strategy change and the

least informative event available.

Scripts

| Script | Role |

|---|---|

| [scripts/post_performance_analyzer.py](scripts/post_performance_analyzer.py) | Median/MAD, percentile bands, IQR outlier fence, per-post BREAKOUT→DUD classification; refuses conclusions below 10 posts. |

| [scripts/pattern_miner.py](scripts/pattern_miner.py) | Four-gate permutation test with multiple-comparisons accounting; reports why every rejected candidate failed. |

| [scripts/experiment_planner.py](scripts/experiment_planner.py) | Sizes a two-arm posting experiment, names the confounds to hold constant, and writes the falsification condition before the first post. |

References and assets

  • [references/linkedin_metrics_canon.md](references/linkedin_metrics_canon.md) — what each number is, what it is not, and which three tiers to track (7 sources)
  • [references/evidence_thresholds.md](references/evidence_thresholds.md) — the four gates, forking paths, and the uncomfortable arithmetic of LinkedIn A/B tests (7 sources)
  • [assets/example_post_export.csv](assets/example_post_export.csv) — a 12-post export in the expected shape
  • [assets/measurement_log_template.md](assets/measurement_log_template.md) — the Tier 1 outcome log you keep by hand

Distinct from

  • marketing-skill/social-media-analyzer — cross-platform brand campaign reporting. This

is one person's own LinkedIn export, with refusals attached.

  • linkedin-strategy — decides what to do next. This says what happened.
  • product-team/experiment-designer — product A/B tests with real traffic; here n is

posts, and usually too small.


Version: 1.0.0

想直接用这个技能?

本站把开放许可(MIT / Apache 等)的技能按仓库打包整理到网盘,点一下转存到你自己的网盘,不用一个个从 GitHub 拉。许可未声明的技能只给原始仓库链接,不打包。

它属于哪个仓库

星标★ 26,030
本站分层T1
该仓技能数846
原文件路径marketing/linkedin/skills/linkedin-analytics/SKILL.md

同一个仓库里的其他技能

看这个仓库的全部 846 个技能

同名技能的其他版本

有 2 个不同仓库或目录里都有叫 linkedin-analytics 的技能。它们内容并不相同,别混用: