linkedin-analytics
Use when someone wants to understand their own LinkedIn numbers — which posts worked, why reach dropped, whether a pattern is real, or how to test a…
它会碰到什么
这一栏是扫描器报的事实,不是结论。命中多不等于有毒(安全工具、规则库、示例脚本本来就会包含危险写法),命中少也不等于干净。它和你手上的凭据、文件、网络有什么关系,需要你自己看。
技能内容
LinkedIn Analytics — describe honestly, then refuse to over-conclude
The characteristic sentence of LinkedIn analytics is "carousels do 3x better for me", built
on four posts. With engagement as heavy-tailed as it is, four posts will show a 3x difference
between almost any two groups you care to define. These three scripts stop that sentence
becoming a strategy.
Your own data only. Nothing is fetched; scraping post or profile data is prohibited by
User Agreement §8.2 and none of this analysis needs it.
Workflow
1. Get the export. LinkedIn Analytics → Post impressions → Export, or Settings → Data
privacy → Get a copy of your data. CSV and JSON both work.
2. Describe it. Exit 0 analysed / 2 below the 10-post floor, descriptive only / 3
unusable. Reports median and MAD rather than mean and standard deviation — one breakout post
makes a mean describe a distribution none of your posts belong to — plus Tukey percentile
bands and a 1.5×IQR breakout threshold, so "this did well" has a number behind it.
python3 scripts/post_performance_analyzer.py --input posts.csv --csv --output human
3. Test the pattern they think they see.
python3 scripts/pattern_miner.py --input posts.json --output human
Exit 0 something survived / 2 nothing survived / 3 under 10 posts. Four gates: 5 posts in and
5 out; a 15% relative difference in medians; beating 90% of 2,000 seeded label shuffles; and
a multiple-comparisons accounting of how many candidates would pass on noise alone.
"Nothing survived" is the most common honest answer and it is a real finding. Report it
as one. Do not soften it into a hedge that reads like a conclusion.
4. Turn a survivor into a test.
python3 scripts/experiment_planner.py --hypothesis "..." --variable "..." \
--cv 0.45 --effect 0.30 --posts-per-week 2 --max-weeks 12 --output human
CV comes from step 2: 1.4826 * MAD / median. Exit 0 feasible / 2 too long, with the minimum
detectable effect in their window / 3 refused. It will frequently say the test needs more
posts than a quarter allows — that is the honest answer, and more useful than a confident
conclusion from retrospective data.
Rules
- Under 10 posts, describe; do not conclude. Say so plainly.
- A pattern in past posts is a hypothesis. Retrospective data is confounded — you made
carousels when you had structured material, on topics you knew best, in weeks you had time.
No statistics on the same data removes that.
- Never benchmark against someone else's numbers. Different denominator, different
audience, usually a vendor's sample.
- Follower count is not a success metric. Track inbound conversations, specific
references, invitations — the Tier 1 metrics you count by hand.
- Report the confidence level. LinkedIn-official 🟢, third-party study 🟡, folklore 🔴.
- One good post is not evidence. It is the most common cause of a strategy change and the
least informative event available.
Scripts
| Script | Role |
|---|---|
| [scripts/post_performance_analyzer.py](scripts/post_performance_analyzer.py) | Median/MAD, percentile bands, IQR outlier fence, per-post BREAKOUT→DUD classification; refuses conclusions below 10 posts. |
| [scripts/pattern_miner.py](scripts/pattern_miner.py) | Four-gate permutation test with multiple-comparisons accounting; reports why every rejected candidate failed. |
| [scripts/experiment_planner.py](scripts/experiment_planner.py) | Sizes a two-arm posting experiment, names the confounds to hold constant, and writes the falsification condition before the first post. |
References and assets
- [
references/linkedin_metrics_canon.md](references/linkedin_metrics_canon.md) — what each number is, what it is not, and which three tiers to track (7 sources) - [
references/evidence_thresholds.md](references/evidence_thresholds.md) — the four gates, forking paths, and the uncomfortable arithmetic of LinkedIn A/B tests (7 sources)
- [
assets/example_post_export.csv](assets/example_post_export.csv) — a 12-post export in the expected shape - [
assets/measurement_log_template.md](assets/measurement_log_template.md) — the Tier 1 outcome log you keep by hand
Distinct from
marketing-skill/social-media-analyzer— cross-platform brand campaign reporting. This
is one person's own LinkedIn export, with refusals attached.
linkedin-strategy— decides what to do next. This says what happened.product-team/experiment-designer— product A/B tests with real traffic; here n is
posts, and usually too small.
Version: 1.0.0
想直接用这个技能?
本站把开放许可(MIT / Apache 等)的技能按仓库打包整理到网盘,点一下转存到你自己的网盘,不用一个个从 GitHub 拉。许可未声明的技能只给原始仓库链接,不打包。
它属于哪个仓库
marketing/linkedin/skills/linkedin-analytics/SKILL.md