跳到主要内容
知仓学习社ZHICANG

ciso-review

/cs:ciso-review <plan> — Risk-paranoid interrogation of any plan that touches data, compliance, or production access. Use when launching features th…

不碰外部(只输出文字)无严重或高危命中alirezarezvani/claude-skills

它会碰到什么

扫了多少1 个文本文件,3 KB
它会碰到什么不碰外部(只输出文字)
命中总数0 处
命中统计严重 0 · 高 0 · 中 0 · 低 0

这一栏是扫描器报的事实,不是结论。命中多不等于有毒(安全工具、规则库、示例脚本本来就会包含危险写法),命中少也不等于干净。它和你手上的凭据、文件、网络有什么关系,需要你自己看。

技能内容

/cs:ciso-review — CISO Forcing Questions

Command: /cs:ciso-review <plan>

The risk-paranoid threat-modeler. Six questions before any production change that touches customer data or compliance scope.

When to Run

  • Before deploying any system that touches PII / PHI / cardholder data
  • Before signing a new vendor with data access
  • Before a compliance audit (SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR)
  • Before any architecture decision crossing trust boundaries
  • After any near-miss incident

The Six CISO Questions

1. Threat Model

What's the STRIDE threat model for this system, and which threat is most likely?

  • Spoofing, Tampering, Repudiation, Info Disclosure, DoS, Elevation of Privilege.
  • Pick the top 3 by likelihood × impact.

2. Blast Radius

If this is fully compromised, what data is exposed and how many users are affected?

  • Worst case in plain English.
  • Quantify in dollars via FAIR-based ALE.

3. Detection

What signals indicate compromise, and how long until they're triggered (MTTD)?

  • Logs alone are not detection.
  • Define the detection rule, the alert, and the on-call.

4. Response

Is there an IR runbook for this scenario, and has it been tabletop-tested?

  • If no runbook: build one before ship.
  • If untested: tabletop before ship.

5. Regulatory Window

What's the regulator notification window if this scenario occurs?

  • GDPR: 72h. HIPAA: 60d. State breach laws vary.
  • Pre-write the customer comms template.

6. Vendor & Supply Chain

Which third-party vendors are in scope, and what's their security posture?

  • Subprocessor list current?
  • DPAs in place?
  • Last security review per vendor?

Workflow

python ../../../c-level-advisor/skills/ciso-advisor/scripts/risk_quantifier.py
python ../../../c-level-advisor/skills/ciso-advisor/scripts/compliance_tracker.py

Output Format

# CISO Review: <plan>
**Date:** YYYY-MM-DD

## Threat Model
- Top threat: <STRIDE category> — <description>
- Likelihood: H/M/L | Impact: H/M/L
- ALE: $X / year

## Blast Radius
- Data exposed (worst case): <description>
- Users affected: N
- Estimated cost: $X

## Detection
- MTTD target: X hours
- Current MTTD: X hours
- Detection rule: <name>

## Response
- IR runbook: ✅ / ❌
- Last tabletop: <date>

## Regulatory
- Frameworks in scope: SOC 2 / ISO 27001 / HIPAA / GDPR
- Notification window: X hours/days

## Vendors
- New vendors added: N
- DPAs signed: N / N
- Security reviews complete: N / N

## Verdict
🟢 SHIP | 🟡 MITIGATE THEN SHIP | 🔴 BLOCK

Routing

  • /cs:cto-review — architecture alignment
  • /cs:gc-review — DPA, regulatory implications
  • /cs:decide — log risk acceptance
  • /cs:boardroom — for CRITICAL risks

Related

  • Agent: [cs-ciso-advisor](../../agents/cs-ciso-advisor.md)
  • Skill: [ciso-advisor](../../../c-level-advisor/skills/ciso-advisor/SKILL.md)
  • Compliance: ../../../ra-qm-team/

Version: 1.0.0

想直接用这个技能?

本站把开放许可(MIT / Apache 等)的技能按仓库打包整理到网盘,点一下转存到你自己的网盘,不用一个个从 GitHub 拉。许可未声明的技能只给原始仓库链接,不打包。

同名技能的其他版本

有 2 个不同仓库或目录里都有叫 ciso-review 的技能。它们内容并不相同,别混用: