跳到主要内容
知仓学习社ZHICANG

codex-delegate

Delegate coding tasks to the OpenAI Codex CLI only when the user explicitly

不碰外部(只输出文字)无严重或高危命中sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills

它会碰到什么

扫了多少5 个文本文件,38 KB
它会碰到什么不碰外部(只输出文字)
命中总数0 处
命中统计严重 0 · 高 0 · 中 0 · 低 0

这一栏是扫描器报的事实,不是结论。命中多不等于有毒(安全工具、规则库、示例脚本本来就会包含危险写法),命中少也不等于干净。它和你手上的凭据、文件、网络有什么关系,需要你自己看。

技能内容

Codex Delegate

When to Use

  • You want to delegate a bounded coding task to a separate codex implementer (OpenAI Codex) and then review its diff yourself.
  • The user explicitly asked for delegation to this implementer.

You are the orchestrator. This skill lets you hand a bounded coding task to a separate

implementer — the OpenAI Codex CLI — then review what it produced and land it yourself. You write

the brief and own the judgment; Codex does the typing in its own sandbox; you verify and commit.

Nothing here is specific to one orchestrating agent. The loop needs only the ability to run a shell

command and read a file, so it works the same whether you are Claude Code, OpenCode with a selected

model, or any comparable agent. (It is designed for and run on Claude Code; treat other orchestrators

as designed-for, not yet proven.)

When NOT to use this

  • The task is small enough to just do inline — delegation overhead is not worth it.
  • The codex CLI is not installed or not authenticated (run codex login).
  • You want to write the code yourself, or you only need a review (use Codex's own review command).

Prerequisites (check once)

  1. codex --version succeeds. If not, install (npm i -g @openai/codex) and codex login.
  2. Confirm which codex is on PATH. Multiple installs are common (e.g. a current npm/nvm copy and

a stale Homebrew one). command -v codex shows the active one and codex --version its version —

an old binary predates flags this skill relies on (codex exec --json, -o, exec resume). The

relay also records the version it ran into result.json, so a stale binary is visible after the fact.

  1. You are in (or will point --cd at) the target git repository.

The loop

Run these five steps per task. Steps 1, 4, and 5 are your judgment; 2 and 3 are mechanical.

1. Write the brief

Codex sees only the text you send — no repo memory, no chat history, no shared context. Everything the

task needs goes in the brief: the goal, the current state, what to change, what to leave untouched,

the project's actual gate commands (discover them from the repo's CLAUDE.md/AGENTS.md/Makefile —

do not assume), and a report contract. Tell Codex it will not commit (you will). Keep one task per

brief. Full guidance and a template: [references/writing-the-brief.md](references/writing-the-brief.md).

2. Dispatch

Send the brief to Codex with the bundled helper. It wraps codex exec, captures the run, and writes a

structured result.json — so your only job is "run a command, read a file." (<skill-dir> below is

this skill's installed directory — the folder containing this SKILL.md, i.e. the directory you loaded

the skill from. Claude Code prints it as "Base directory for this skill" when the skill loads; on other

orchestrators use that same directory — if unsure where it landed, run

find ~ -name relay.mjs -path 'codex-delegate' and substitute the directory above it.)

node "<skill-dir>/scripts/relay.mjs" --brief brief.txt --cd /path/to/repo
# read-only (review/diagnosis, no edits):   add --read-only
# continue the exact Codex session:         add --session <threadId>  (from result.json; send only the delta brief)
# fallback when no thread id is available:  add --resume-last
# hard time limit (watchdog):               add --timeout 2h  (default: off; implementation runs routinely need 1-2h)
# see all options:                          node .../relay.mjs --help

The helper defaults to a write-capable (workspace-write) sandbox and writes its artifacts to a temp

dir, so the repo under review stays clean. It never commits — see step 5. Mechanics, flags, and the

result.json shape: [references/dispatch-and-poll.md](references/dispatch-and-poll.md).

3. Wait for completion

The helper blocks until Codex finishes, so back it with whatever your orchestrator offers and resume

when it returns:

  • Claude Code: run the Bash call with run_in_background: true; you are notified on completion.
  • Plain shell / other agents: run it in the foreground for short tasks, or background it and poll

the result file — … & in bash/zsh (including Git Bash/WSL), or your shell's equivalent (Start-Job

in PowerShell, start /b in cmd). The run is done when result.json exists with a status. (A

pre-run usage error — bad args or an empty brief — instead exits with code 2 and a stderr message and

writes no result file, so check the exit code too. A missing codex binary exits 127 but does write

a result.json with status codex_unavailable.)

Do not trust progress trackers over reality: a run is finished when result.json is written and the

process has exited. Read the working tree, not a status line. The implementer's full report is

the finalMessage field in result.json (also printed in full on stdout between the report markers).

4. Review — do not trust the self-report

Codex's result.json includes its own summary and gate claims. Re-verify, don't accept:

  • Re-run the project's gates yourself (the test/lint/build commands from step 1). Never take

"gates passed" on faith.

  • Read the diff against the brief: did Codex do what was asked, nothing more (scope creep) and

nothing less? touchedFiles in the result is your starting point.

  • Run the relevant guard skills on the diff if you have them installed (clean-code-guard,

test-guard, etc. from guard-skills) — this skill produces the work; those skills judge it.

  • For schema/migration changes, round-trip them; for removals, grep for dangling references.

Full checklist: [references/review-and-land.md](references/review-and-land.md).

5. Land it

Because Codex's sandbox cannot reliably write .git (it varies by version, OS, and path), **the

orchestrator commits.** Only after the gates pass and the diff holds:

  • Commit the verified work yourself, with a clear message.
  • If it needs changes, send a delta brief with --session <threadId> from the prior result.json

(use --resume-last only when no thread id is available), and review again.

Read-only second opinions

The relay doubles as a clean way to get an adversarial second opinion with no write risk: dispatch

--read-only with a brief that lists the agreed points, then each contested point with both

positions, and ask Codex to defend or concede each — deliverable in its final message, touching no

files. Any delegation skill whose implementer offers a read-only mode supports the same use, but

check how hard that mode's guarantee is first: Codex's sandbox enforces it, while Grok's is

best-effort and only flagged after the fact (readOnlyViolation) — for those implementers,

verify touchedFiles came back empty instead of assuming no edits.

Authorization model

Delegation is something the human opts into. Once they have ("run this queue", "proceed"), committing

verified, gate-passing work is the agreed contract — that is the whole point. Two limits on that

mandate: surface, don't absorb (report Codex's design decisions, defensible-but-unasked turns, and

non-blocking nitpicks rather than silently keeping them) and stop for scope changes (if correct

completion needs going beyond the brief, ask — don't expand the mandate yourself). The full treatment

is in [references/review-and-land.md](references/review-and-land.md).

If you have the openai-codex plugin

The official openai-codex Claude Code plugin is excellent and complementarycodex-delegate

builds on the same codex CLI, it doesn't replace the plugin. They point in different directions:

  • The plugin's codex:codex-rescue agent is a forwarder: it hands one task to Codex and returns

the output. It deliberately does not poll, review, or commit.

  • The plugin's review command and stop-review gate run the inverse direction: Codex reviews your work.
  • codex-delegate is the orchestration loop in the other direction: you drive Codex to

implement across one task or a queue, and you review and land each result. That loop — brief →

dispatch → poll → review → commit, with the orchestrator owning the commit — is what the plugin

leaves to you, and what this skill encodes.

If you have the plugin installed, its companion CLI is an optional alternative dispatch backend; the

bundled relay.mjs is the default because it adds no install of its own beyond the codex binary

(Node and git, which the relay also needs, are prerequisites for every skill here).

References

  • [references/writing-the-brief.md](references/writing-the-brief.md) — how to write a brief Codex can

execute blind: structure, XML blocks, the report contract, embedding the real gate commands.

  • [references/dispatch-and-poll.md](references/dispatch-and-poll.md) — relay.mjs flags, the

result.json contract, backgrounding per orchestrator, and recovery when a run misbehaves.

  • [references/review-and-land.md](references/review-and-land.md) — the review checklist, the commit

boundary, and the exact-session rework cycle.

  • [references/multi-task-queues.md](references/multi-task-queues.md) — running a sequential queue:

carrying constraints forward, progress tracking, and the end-of-run coherence check.

Limitations

  • Docs-only import — executable scripts/relay.mjs not included; see upstream for full runtime. Requires codex CLI, Node 18+, git.
  • Relay never commits — it only returns structured result JSON; you review and land the commit.

> Adapted from amElnagdy/delegate-skills (MIT) — docs-only, runtime not bundled.

想直接用这个技能?

本站把开放许可(MIT / Apache 等)的技能按仓库打包整理到网盘,点一下转存到你自己的网盘,不用一个个从 GitHub 拉。许可未声明的技能只给原始仓库链接,不打包。

同名技能的其他版本

有 3 个不同仓库或目录里都有叫 codex-delegate 的技能。它们内容并不相同,别混用: