venue-contract-review
Read a venue contract for the clauses that actually cost money — the minimum spend, the cancellation ladder, the attrition clause, and everything th…
它会碰到什么
这一栏是扫描器报的事实,不是结论。命中多不等于有毒(安全工具、规则库、示例脚本本来就会包含危险写法),命中少也不等于干净。它和你手上的凭据、文件、网络有什么关系,需要你自己看。
技能内容
Venue Contract Review
Venue contracts are priced in the exclusions. The hire fee is the headline; the money is in minimum spend, the cancellation ladder, attrition, mandatory suppliers, and the six things you assumed were included. This reads for exposure rather than for legality — what could this contract cost that the quoted fee does not show, and which three clauses are worth spending negotiating capital on.
What This Skill Produces
- The commercial summary — what is actually being committed to, in money and dates
- Flagged clauses ranked by exposure — worst-case cost of each, not just its presence
- What is not included — the list that turns a hire fee into a real budget line
- Negotiation asks in priority order — because you will not win all of them, and some matter far more
- Questions to put in writing — the ambiguities that must be resolved before signature, not after
- The decision points calendar — cancellation tiers, guarantee deadlines, and final-numbers dates
Required Inputs
Ask for these if not provided:
- The contract or proposal — the full document including annexes and the fine print
- The event — date, expected headcount, format, and how firm the numbers are
- What you were told verbally — sales conversations often contain promises the contract does not
- Your constraints — budget ceiling, whether the date could move, and how certain attendance is
- Comparable options — whether you have an alternative venue, which determines your leverage
Framework: Price the Downside, Not the Headline
- Find the total commitment, not the hire fee. Hire plus minimum spend plus mandatory services plus service charge and tax is the real number.
- Map the cancellation ladder to a calendar. At what date does cancelling cost 25%, 50%, 100%? Put those dates in the diary — they are the real decision points.
- Read the attrition clause carefully. If you contract for 200 and 150 attend, what do you pay? This is where events lose money quietly.
- List everything not included. Tables, linen, power, cleaning, security, AV, corkage, overtime, get-out. Each is a budget line the fee implies you do not need.
- Check the mandatory suppliers. In-house AV or catering with no competitive alternative is a pricing position, and it needs testing before signature.
- Look for the asymmetries. Their right to relocate you, to change the room, to cancel — versus yours. Force majeure and access-time guarantees matter more after recent years.
- Prioritise three asks. Cancellation terms, attrition percentage, and the biggest exclusion. Trading everything at once wins nothing.
Output Format
Venue contract review: [venue] · [event] · [date]
Commercial summary: hire [amount] · minimum spend [amount] · mandatory services [amount] · service charge [%] · tax [%] · total commitment [amount]
Exposure ranking
| Clause | What it says | Worst case | Exposure |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cancellation | [terms] | [amount] | High |
| Attrition | [terms] | [amount if numbers drop] | |
| Minimum spend | [terms] | [shortfall payable] | |
| Overtime / curfew | [rate] | [amount] | |
Decision calendar
| Date | What happens | Cost of cancelling after this |
|---|---|---|
| [date] | [tier change / final numbers due / deposit] | [amount] |
Not included — [each item, with estimated cost to source separately]
Mandatory suppliers: [who, for what, whether rates are fixed, whether alternatives are permitted]
Asymmetries: [their rights vs yours — relocation, cancellation, force majeure, access times]
Negotiation asks — in priority order
- [ask] — [why it matters most] — [fallback position]
- [ask] — [rationale] — [fallback]
- [ask] — [rationale] — [fallback]
Put in writing before signing: [the ambiguities and the verbal promises that need to appear in the document]
> Not legal advice. This identifies commercial exposure; it does not assess enforceability, and contract law varies by jurisdiction. Have a qualified lawyer review any significant venue contract before signature.
Quality Checks
- [ ] Total commitment is calculated, not just the hire fee
- [ ] Cancellation tiers are converted into diary dates
- [ ] The attrition clause is modelled against a realistic headcount drop
- [ ] Everything not included is listed with an estimated separate cost
- [ ] Mandatory suppliers and whether alternatives are permitted are identified
- [ ] Rights are compared in both directions, not only the venue's obligations
- [ ] Negotiation asks are prioritised to three, each with a fallback
Anti-Patterns
- Reading the hire fee as the cost. It is the smallest number in the document.
- Skipping the attrition clause. The quietest way an event loses money.
- Not diarising the cancellation tiers. The decision date passes unnoticed and the option disappears.
- Assuming tables, power and cleaning are included. They frequently are not.
- Relying on what the salesperson said. If it is not in the contract, it does not exist.
- Negotiating twelve points. Signals no priorities and wins nothing.
- Signing without legal review on a material contract. This skill is not a lawyer.
Example Trigger Phrases
- "Review this venue contract before I sign it"
- "What does this attrition clause actually mean?"
- "What is not included in this venue hire fee?"
- "How do I negotiate better cancellation terms?"
- "Is this minimum spend reasonable for 200 guests?"
想直接用这个技能?
本站把开放许可(MIT / Apache 等)的技能按仓库打包整理到网盘,点一下转存到你自己的网盘,不用一个个从 GitHub 拉。许可未声明的技能只给原始仓库链接,不打包。
同名技能的其他版本
有 3 个不同仓库或目录里都有叫 venue-contract-review 的技能。它们内容并不相同,别混用:
- mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills — Read a venue contract for the clauses that actually cost money — the minimum spend, the ca
- mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills — Read a venue contract for the clauses that actually cost money — the minimum spend, the ca