rebuttal-guidance
>-
它会碰到什么
这一栏是扫描器报的事实,不是结论。命中多不等于有毒(安全工具、规则库、示例脚本本来就会包含危险写法),命中少也不等于干净。它和你手上的凭据、文件、网络有什么关系,需要你自己看。
技能内容
Rebuttal Guidance
Overview
This skill delivers executable rebuttal guidance per concern: structured plans,
evidence pointers, tone and strategy priorities. It does not produce
ready-to-paste rebuttal prose; the author writes the final text.
The core model is conditional persuasion P(Z=1 | X, Y):
- X: reviewer mindset (behavior cluster inferred from review text)
- Y: rebuttal strategy vector (which tactics to emphasize)
- Z: success (score increase or paper accepted)
When to use
- User pastes Weaknesses / Questions from ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML, EMNLP, etc.
- User asks how to respond to a specific reviewer comment.
- User wants a structured plan before writing rebuttal prose.
- User asks which tone or evidence strategy fits a harsh vs. open reviewer.
- User says "reviewer ignored my rebuttal" and wants to recalibrate.
When NOT to use
- User wants full rebuttal text copied verbatim → output guidance first; warn
against blind LLM paste.
- User asks to evaluate a research idea → use
idea-evaluator. - User asks for pre-submission paper review → use
pre-submission-reviewer. - No review text provided → ask for it first.
Core procedure
Step 1: Inventory concerns
Extract every numbered Weakness and Question from the pasted review. If the
user pasted only one reviewer's block, ask whether other reviewers exist.
Output a short table:
| ID | Type | One-line summary |
|----|------|-----------------|
| R1.W1 | W | ... |
| R1.Q1 | Q | ... |
Step 2: Classify each concern
See: [references/concern-classification.md](references/concern-classification.md)
Tag each item as one of:
`misunderstanding | evidence_gap | novelty | baseline_fairness | scope_claim |
writing_clarity | theory | efficiency | other`
Step 3: Match reviewer mindset (X)
See: [references/mindset-matching-heuristics.md](references/mindset-matching-heuristics.md)
Score the review on 5–7 behavior signals (openness, severity, constructiveness,
specificity, skepticism, harshness, actionability). Map scores to a cluster in
[references/mindset-library.md](references/mindset-library.md).
State: matched cluster name, confidence (high / medium / low), and the
specific phrases that triggered the match.
Step 4: Strategy priorities for this mindset (Y)
From the matched cluster in [references/mindset-library.md](references/mindset-library.md), read:
- Historical up-rate: calibrate how likely a score increase is.
- Rule-stat diffs (success vs. failure %): boost tactics with positive diff.
- Cohen's d effects: highlight dimensions with d > 0.8 in success group.
- Success / failure patterns: concrete do's and don'ts from data.
- Key strategy: one-sentence summary for this cluster.
Cross-check dimensions in [references/strategy-dimensions.md](references/strategy-dimensions.md).
Step 5: Per-concern guidance
For each concern, emit a guidance block (not final prose):
### R?.W?: [short title]
- **Concern type**: ...
- **Mindset-aware strategy**: ...
- **Recommended structure**: Acknowledge → Response → Evidence → Revision note
- **Clarify from paper?**: yes/no: where to look (section, table, appendix)
- **New experiment needed?**: yes/no: what exactly (no fabricated numbers)
- **Tone note**: ...
- **Template**: A / B / C: see references/response-templates.md
- **Avoid**: ...
Do not fabricate experimental numbers. Mark anything unverified as
[TO VERIFY].
Step 6: Integrity gate
Before finalizing, run through [references/checklist.md](references/checklist.md).
Key flags:
- Every W/Q has a guidance block.
- No fabricated numbers.
- Defensive phrases (e.g., "you misunderstood") flagged.
- Overpromise risk flagged for scope_claim and evidence_gap types.
Step 7: Output format
Deliver a ## Rebuttal Guidance section containing:
- Reviewer mindset summary: cluster name, confidence, identifying phrases.
- Global strategy priorities: 3–5 bullets from mindset data.
- Per-concern guidance: Step 5 blocks for each W/Q.
- Checklist highlights: pass/fail on key integrity items.
Reference map
| Purpose | File |
|---------|------|
| Concern type → response priority | [concern-classification.md](references/concern-classification.md) |
| Reviewer signal → mindset cluster | [mindset-matching-heuristics.md](references/mindset-matching-heuristics.md) |
| Mindset clusters with stats & patterns | [mindset-library.md](references/mindset-library.md) |
| 10 strategy dimensions (Y) | [strategy-dimensions.md](references/strategy-dimensions.md) |
| Response templates A / B / C | [response-templates.md](references/response-templates.md) |
| Pre-submit integrity checklist | [checklist.md](references/checklist.md) |
想直接用这个技能?
本站把开放许可(MIT / Apache 等)的技能按仓库打包整理到网盘,点一下转存到你自己的网盘,不用一个个从 GitHub 拉。许可未声明的技能只给原始仓库链接,不打包。