跳到主要内容
知仓学习社ZHICANG

platform-apex-test-generate

Generate and validate Apex test classes with TestDataFactory patterns, bulk testing (251+ records), mocking strategies, assertion best practices, an…

不碰外部(只输出文字)无严重或高危命中forcedotcom/sf-skills

它会碰到什么

扫了多少5 个文本文件,27 KB
它会碰到什么不碰外部(只输出文字)
命中总数0 处
命中统计严重 0 · 高 0 · 中 0 · 低 0

这一栏是扫描器报的事实,不是结论。命中多不等于有毒(安全工具、规则库、示例脚本本来就会包含危险写法),命中少也不等于干净。它和你手上的凭据、文件、网络有什么关系,需要你自己看。

技能内容

Generating Apex Tests

Generate production-ready Apex test classes and run disciplined test-fix loops with coverage analysis.

Core Principles

  1. One behavior per method — each test method validates a single scenario. Separate positive, negative, and bulk tests. NEVER combine related-but-distinct inputs (e.g., null and empty) in one method — create _NullInput_ and _EmptyInput_ as separate test methods
  2. Bulkify tests — test with 251+ records to cross the 200-record trigger batch boundary. Batch Apex exception: in test context only one execute() invocation runs, so set batchSize >= testRecordCount. See [references/async-testing.md](references/async-testing.md)
  3. Isolate test data — every @TestSetup must delegate record creation to a TestDataFactory class. If none exists, create one first. Never build record lists inline in @TestSetup. Never rely on org data (SeeAllData=false) or hardcoded IDs. For duplicate rule handling, see [references/test-data-factory.md](references/test-data-factory.md)
  4. Assert meaningfully — use exact expected values computed from test data setup. NEVER use range assertions or approximate counts when the value is deterministic. Always include failure messages. See [references/assertion-patterns.md](references/assertion-patterns.md)
  5. Use Assert class onlyAssert.areEqual, Assert.isTrue, Assert.fail, etc. Never use legacy System.assert, System.assertEquals, or System.assertNotEquals
  6. Mock external boundaries — use HttpCalloutMock for callouts, Test.setFixedSearchResults for SOSL, DML mock classes for database isolation. Design for testability via constructor injection. See [references/mocking-patterns.md](references/mocking-patterns.md)
  7. Test negative paths — validate error handling and exception scenarios, not just happy paths
  8. Wrap with start/stop — pair Test.startTest() with Test.stopTest() to reset governor limits and force async execution

Test.startTest() / Test.stopTest()

Always wrap the code under test in Test.startTest() / Test.stopTest():

  • Resets governor limits so the test measures only the code under test
  • Executes async operations synchronously (queueables, batch, future methods)
  • Fires scheduled jobs immediately

Test Code Anti-Patterns

| Anti-Pattern | Fix |

|---|---|

| SOQL/DML inside loops | Query once before the loop; use Map<Id, SObject> for lookups |

| Magic numbers in assertions | Derive expected values from setup constants |

| God test class (>500 lines) | Split into multiple test classes by behavior area |

| Long test methods (>30 lines) | Extract Given/When/Then into helper methods |

| Generic Exception catch | Catch the specific expected type (e.g., DmlException) |

Workflow

Step 1 — Gather Context

Before generating or fixing tests, identify:

  • the target production class(es) under test
  • existing test classes, test data factories, and setup helpers
  • desired test scope (single class, specific methods, suite, or local tests)
  • coverage threshold (75% minimum for deploy, 90%+ recommended)
  • org alias when running tests against an org

Step 2 — Generate the Test Class

Apply the structure, naming conventions, and patterns from the asset templates and reference docs.

MANDATORY — File Deliverables: For every test class, create BOTH files:

  1. {ClassName}Test.cls — the test class (use [assets/test-class-template.cls](assets/test-class-template.cls) as starting point)
  2. {ClassName}Test.cls-meta.xml — the metadata file:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ApexClass xmlns="http://soap.sforce.com/2006/04/metadata">
    <apiVersion>66.0</apiVersion>
    <status>Active</status>
</ApexClass>

If no TestDataFactory exists in the project, create TestDataFactory.cls + TestDataFactory.cls-meta.xml using [assets/test-data-factory-template.cls](assets/test-data-factory-template.cls).

@TestSetup Example

@TestSetup
static void setupTestData() {
    List<Account> accounts = TestDataFactory.createAccounts(251, true);
}

Test Method Structure

Use Given/When/Then:

@isTest
static void shouldUpdateStatus_WhenValidInput() {
    // Given
    List<Account> accounts = [SELECT Id FROM Account];

    // When
    Test.startTest();
    MyService.processAccounts(accounts);
    Test.stopTest();

    // Then
    List<Account> updated = [SELECT Id, Status__c FROM Account];
    Assert.areEqual(251, updated.size(), 'All accounts should be processed');
}

Negative Test — Exception Pattern

Use try/catch with Assert.fail to verify expected exceptions:

@isTest
static void shouldThrowException_WhenInvalidInput() {
    // Given
    List<Account> emptyList = new List<Account>();

    // When/Then
    Test.startTest();
    try {
        MyService.processAccounts(emptyList);
        Assert.fail('Expected MyCustomException to be thrown');
    } catch (MyCustomException e) {
        Assert.isTrue(e.getMessage().contains('cannot be empty'),
            'Exception message should indicate empty input');
    }
    Test.stopTest();
}

Naming Convention

  • should[ExpectedResult]_When[Scenario]: shouldSendNotification_WhenOpportunityClosedWon
  • [SubjectOrAction]_[Scenario]_[ExpectedResult]: AccountUpdate_ChangeName_Success

Step 3 — Run Tests

Start narrow when debugging; widen after the fix is stable.

# Single test class
sf apex run test --class-names MyServiceTest --result-format human --code-coverage --target-org <alias>

# Specific test methods
sf apex run test --tests MyServiceTest.shouldUpdateStatus_WhenValidInput --result-format human --target-org <alias>

# All local tests
sf apex run test --test-level RunLocalTests --result-format human --code-coverage --target-org <alias>

Step 4 — Analyze Results

Focus on:

  • failing methods — exception types and stack traces
  • uncovered lines and weak coverage areas
  • whether failures indicate bad test data, brittle assertions, or broken production logic
  • when class metadata crosses from versions 66.0 and below to 67.0 and above, check explicit sharing, decide user/system mode per operation, grant required CRUD/FLS in test users or permission sets, and rerun affected tests

Step 5 — Fix Loop

When tests fail, run a disciplined fix loop (max 3 iterations — stop and surface root cause if still failing):

  1. Read the failing test class and the class under test
  2. Identify root cause from error messages and stack traces
  3. Apply fix — adjust test data or assertions for test-side issues; delegate production code issues to the platform-apex-generate skill
  4. Rerun the focused test before broader regression
  5. Repeat until all tests pass, iteration limit reached, or root cause requires design change

Step 6 — Validate Coverage

| Level | Coverage | Purpose |

|-------|----------|---------|

| Production deploy | 75% minimum | Required by Salesforce |

| Recommended | 90%+ | Best practice target |

| Critical paths | 100% | Business-critical code |

Cover all paths: positive, negative/exception, bulk (251+ records), callout/async.

What to Test by Component

| Component | Key Test Scenarios |

|-----------|-------------------|

| Trigger | Bulk insert/update/delete, recursion guard, field change detection |

| Service | Valid/invalid inputs, bulk operations, exception handling |

| Controller | Page load, action methods, view state |

| Batch | start/execute/finish, scope matching (batch size >= record count), Database.Stateful tracking, error handling, chaining (separate methods — finish() calling Database.executeBatch() throws UnexpectedException) |

| Queueable | Chaining (only first job runs in tests), bulkification, error handling, callout mocks before Test.startTest() |

| Callout | Success response, error response, timeout |

| Selector | Valid/null/empty inputs, bulk (251+), field population, sort order, WITH USER_MODE via System.runAs |

| Scheduled | Direct execution via execute(null), CRON registration via CronTrigger query |

| Platform Event | Test.enableChangeDataCapture(), Test.getEventBus().deliver(), verify subscriber side effects |

Output Expectations

Deliverables per test class:

  • {ClassName}Test.cls + {ClassName}Test.cls-meta.xml (match API version of class under test; default 66.0)
  • TestDataFactory.cls + TestDataFactory.cls-meta.xml (if not already present)

Reference Files

Load on demand for detailed patterns:

| Reference | When to use |

|-----------|-------------|

| [references/test-data-factory.md](references/test-data-factory.md) | TestDataFactory patterns, field overrides, duplicate rule handling |

| [references/assertion-patterns.md](references/assertion-patterns.md) | Assertion best practices, anti-patterns, common pitfalls |

| [references/mocking-patterns.md](references/mocking-patterns.md) | HttpCalloutMock, DML mocking, StubProvider, SOSL, Email, Platform Events |

| [references/async-testing.md](references/async-testing.md) | Batch, Queueable, Future, Scheduled job testing |

想直接用这个技能?

本站把开放许可(MIT / Apache 等)的技能按仓库打包整理到网盘,点一下转存到你自己的网盘,不用一个个从 GitHub 拉。许可未声明的技能只给原始仓库链接,不打包。

同名技能的其他版本

有 2 个不同仓库或目录里都有叫 platform-apex-test-generate 的技能。它们内容并不相同,别混用:

  • forcedotcom/sf-skills — Generate and validate Apex test classes with TestDataFactory patterns, bulk testing (251+